http://www.nuclearblog.org/2007/12/13/plutonium-polymer-mystery-solved/ Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:44:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 http://www.nuclearblog.org/2007/12/13/plutonium-polymer-mystery-solved/#comment-98 ламинат Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:50:18 +0000 http://www.nuclearblog.org/2007/12/13/plutonium-polymer-mystery-solved/#comment-98 8gI'll thingk about it.5n I compleatly disagree with last post . fcz <a href="http://skuper.ru" rel="nofollow">паркет</a> 3z 8gI’ll thingk about it.5n I compleatly disagree with last post . fcz
паркет 3z

]]> http://www.nuclearblog.org/2007/12/13/plutonium-polymer-mystery-solved/#comment-9 Mitch Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:59:04 +0000 http://www.nuclearblog.org/2007/12/13/plutonium-polymer-mystery-solved/#comment-9 That is what the figure said in the text, maybe the author will enlighten us? That is what the figure said in the text, maybe the author will enlighten us?

]]> http://www.nuclearblog.org/2007/12/13/plutonium-polymer-mystery-solved/#comment-8 gippgig Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:58:00 +0000 http://www.nuclearblog.org/2007/12/13/plutonium-polymer-mystery-solved/#comment-8 Pu38O54(H2O)8 should have a charge of 44+. I suspect this should be Pu38O56(H2O)8. Pu38O54(H2O)8 should have a charge of 44+. I suspect this should be Pu38O56(H2O)8.

]]>